Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JaneH's avatar

Echoing the comment below, I wonder if Henry VIII was the beginning of the "welfare state". Up till then the church had collected tithes or taxes and used them - or was supposed to use them - for education, health care and the relief of the poor. Secular governments - kings - were more about defence of the realm/conquest. There is no perfect system. There never can be. As Paul has written elsewhere, we are all fallen creatures. But a state in which education, health care and the relief of the poor are underpinned by shared spirituality seems to me a much better way of organising things.

Kathy's avatar

Somewhere I heard that with the dissolution of the monasteries (however corrupt some of them might have been) the very fabric of communities was rent apart. I can well imagine this. I live near a monastery and even today, monasteries provide purpose, spiritual meaning, and succour to local communities. As of old, monasteries today can be corrupt, but the heart of them is above that. The loss of so many holy places which were also a practical help to their communities cannot be under-estimated. I wonder if this was the start point for the gradual loss of Christian belief in Britain. Imagine how it might have panned out had those monasteries thrived over the following centuries.

65 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?